The WTO is not only about liberalizing trade, and in some circumstances it's principles support preserving trade barriers - for example to keep consumers, save the environment or stop the spread of disease. It treats with the principles of trade between nations at a universal level. But there is additional to it than that deal. There are a number of routes of looking at the WTO. In conclusion, it doesn't signify that any shape of global trade is agreeable without any idea! Protestors are worried at the corporate push in global trade where national safety measures, laws and principles are often considered as blocks to commerce and a largely unelected group of WTO officials can make these choices. Criticism is also in respect of the corporate effect on the trend the actual principles of commerce are made (and what the principles are), as companies are not democratic and yet the principles that they are pushing upwards via the WTO affect everybody.
Connected with the IMF and World Bank structural modification policies creating developed nations dependent upon advanced countries, this is a problem as the beneficiaries of universal trade in its current shape is seriously deformed. Both developing and developed countries could profit from universal commerce. However, actually only the advanced countries have really profited (and that has also been at the price of rise in poverty in their own countries). This has intended that those who have profited (including enormous universal media welters) insist the similar shape to go on—after all, if it repairs for you, why change it? As advanced nations have been growing their defeats with the WTO, many are proposing that the UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade And Development) would also be a democratic organization to home universal trade problems.