Globalization has authorized associations to handle the entire world as their marketplace, and as a consequence they have become less and less responsible to any one polity. Indeed, The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) pact shortens the capacity of a state to adjust the stream of capital in to and out of a state. As companies become more hidden from national and international organizing, utilization of the environment and of their laborers becomes job as habitual.
To bypass future collisions, national and international governing organizations must now gather steps to better adjust trade and corporate performance, assuring corporate responsibility. The Battle in Seattle was the Boston Tea Party of antiglobalization protests. If today's global choices do not respond to the validity of the protestors' claims, could Lexington and Concord be just near the angle? Most countries were pro-democracy activists complaining at the serious unfairness at the present model of free trade, while agreed that universal trade is useful to everybody, if it is fair.
Instead, the mainstream media chose to deform the protestors’ worries saying that they were anti-trade and focused mainly on the impulses of the right-ward protectionists from manufacturing nations. This misunderstanding that all who are contrary to the current framework of the WTO must automatically be versus international trade which is unfounded; the problem at Seattle was about complaining the current principles and applications of these ideas.
Most will agree that global trade will be useful and help improving nations to raise their measures of living. Many will also accept that global commerce can promote peace through internationally agreed measures or principles of that commerce, helping decrease the probability of disasters such as World War I and II which emerged through commerce battles between the previous legal nations, whose greed to get the best of them.